ICAIS 2025

Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) have the potential to transform biological research by enabling autonomous experimentation. Yet, their application remains constrained by rigid protocol design, limited adaptability to dynamic lab conditions, inadequate error handling, and high operational complexity. Here we introduce BioMARS (Biological Multi-Agent Robotic System), an intelligent platform that integrates LLMs, VLMs, and modular robotics to autonomously design, plan, and execute biological experiments. BioMARS uses a hierarchical architecture: the Biologist Agent synthesizes protocols via retrieval-augmented generation; the Technician Agent translates them into executable robotic pseudo-code; and the Inspector Agent ensures procedural integrity through multimodal perception and anomaly detection. The system autonomously conducts cell passaging and culture tasks, matching or exceeding manual performance in viability, consistency, and morphological integrity. It also supports context-aware optimization, outperforming conventional strategies in differentiating retinal pigment epithelial cells. A web interface enables real-time human-AI collaboration, while a modular backend allows scalable integration with laboratory hardware. These results highlight the feasibility of generalizable, AI-driven laboratory automation and the transformative role of language-based reasoning in biological research.

Large Language Models (LLMs) hold substantial potential for accelerating academic ideation but face critical challenges in grounding ideas and mitigating confirmation bias for further refinement. We propose integrating motivational knowledge graphs and socratic dialogue to address these limitations in enhanced LLM ideation (MotivGraph-SoIQ). This novel framework provides essential grounding and practical idea improvement steps for LLM ideation by integrating a Motivational Knowledge Graph (MotivGraph) with a Q-Driven Socratic Ideator. The MotivGraph structurally stores three key node types-problem, challenge, and solution—to offer motivation grounding for the LLM ideation process. The Ideator is a dual-agent system utilizing Socratic questioning, which facilitates a rigorous refinement process that mitigates confirmation bias and improves idea quality across novelty, experimental rigor, and motivational rationality dimensions. On the ICLR25 paper topics dataset, MotivGraph-SoIQ exhibits clear advantages over existing state-of-the-art approaches across LLM-based scoring, ELO ranking, and human evaluation metrics.

Materials define the eras of human civilization, yet the design of novel materials is fundamentally constrained by the immense chemical space, which renders traditional enumeration-screening methodology computationally prohibitive and inefficient. This paper introduces a paradigm shift towards insight-exploration-validation, enabling an intelligent and evolutionary exploration of material design pathways. To actualize this paradigm, we propose MatEvolve, a synergistic symbolic–LLM agent that reconceptualizes material design as a closed-loop, programmatic evolution task. Central to MatEvolve is a novel symbolic formalism, Material Edit Language, which empowers the agent to programmatically take chemical operations. The exploration trajectory is directed by a multifaceted guidance strategy, comprising a dynamic knowledge injection mechanism and a two-stage exploration strategy that balances broad exploration and deep optimization. Furthermore, a multi-objective fitness landscape ensures directional and efficient navigational guidance. These integrated strategies contribute to a 32.2% improvement over direct material structure modification. Crucially, comparisons demonstrate that our insight-exploration-validation paradigm outperforms the traditional enumeration-screening approach by 33.6%, highlighting its superior efficacy in navigating vast design spaces.

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel on general visual tasks, their capacity to comprehend complex dynamic systems remains a critical open question. Such systems, governed by physical laws, explicit rules, and multi-agent interactions, form the fabric of the real world. To facilitate a systematic diagnosis of current MLLM limitations, we introduce BasketVision, a new benchmark that leverages professional basketball as a microcosm for these dynamic environments. BasketVision probes model capabilities across seven dimensions—spanning perception, reasoning, and prediction—through 6,000 curated, bilingual questions from professional game data. An automated data generation pipeline underpins the benchmark, ensuring both scalability and fine-grained precision. Our evaluation of 23 leading models reveals a chasm between machine and human cognition: human experts attain 96.34% accuracy, while the premier model, GPT-4o, achieves only 63.15%. The analysis pinpoints spatial reasoning as a persistent bottleneck and uncovers specific patterns of task specialization. BasketVision thus serves as a crucial apparatus for charting the frontiers of MLLMs and steering future work toward more robust reasoning in dynamic visual worlds.